The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Why research replication fails

Lego. Photo.

Communication is key in research. Recently, our lab had a team-building day at the beach. And a simple Lego game can tell very much about the reasons behind the reproducibility crisis in science.

Getting together to communicate new ideas and build relationships is critical for maintaining a vital research group. That is why our lab arranges a team-building once a year, together with the experimental dementia research group. This year, we visited Kastanjelund in Yngsjö for scientific discussions and social activities. Playing games together actually helps to understand the challenges in replicating research findings. 

One of our games consisted in dividing each team into two subgroups, one that could see the original Lego construction and the other that should try to replicate it based on oral instructions and body-language communication. This is more frustrating than you ever think! 

Teams on different sides of a boat. Photo.
Back to the basics; explaining settings to a colleague afterwards may be more tricky than you think!

Despite plenty of time, none of the teams managed to get a perfect copy of the described construction. (Even though they were doing significantly better than expected, some got very close). 

Take-home message: To communicate your methods so that it is crystal clear for a peer to replicate the experimental setup is more difficult than you may think. Method description might not be the most inspiring part to write, but putting effort into clear communication here is necessary to conduct good research.